|
|
|
Profile
| Essays
| Contact
The
Pellesier Building & Wiltern Theater |
Joseph Giovannini
California-born Writer and Architect
Former Critic of the Los Angeles Herald Examiner
In the
early 1980s, Brenda Levin was one of the chief engineers of the epiphany
that the city of the perennial future had a past. Fresh from Harvard's Graduate
School of Design, she was the right architect in the right spot at the right
moment to restore a succession of historic buildings in Los Angeles that
ushered in a civic awareness that the city which had sprawled its way into
suburban amnesia had an inventory of buildings of national interest in its
historic centers. Los Angeles was so geared to a chromed mirage leading
out of the city that it forgot the pedestrian streetscape and Red Line thoroughfares
of its Downtown and inner neighborhoods. Citizens had lost the sense that
Los Angeles had been both urban and urbane. They had lost any notion of
the city's depth of time.
"Along
with the historic architecture itself, Levin was bringing back a piece
of the city, and a piece of Los Angeles' consciousness." |
In the early
1980s, no less than City Hall was trying to sell the ground out from under
one of its major historic monuments, the Los Angeles Public Library by
Bertram Goodhue, to pocket the change and build the pancake library that
is a cart-pushing librarian's dream. There was a void of cultural leadership
about how to handle the city's built patrimony. Who can forget, then,
the revelation of the Oviatt Building, only feet south of Pershing Square,
when Levin restored that eclectic splendor, with all its Art Deco Lalique
glass, and helped convert the paneled haberdashery downstairs into the
elegant Rex restaurant. Working with the visionary developer Wayne Ratkovich,
who realized that he could beat the real estate market on an upswing by
refurbishing an old building, Levin brought the forgotten treasure back
to its state as a landmark of design and craftsmanship. The Oviatt helped
catalyze the preservation movement in Los Angeles--the nascent Los Angeles
Conservancy had one of its inaugural meetings there. In the context of
Los Angeles' push to build high-rises on the new Gold Coast next to the
Harbor freeway, the Oviatt represented a daring walk on the wilder side
of Pershing Square, and a foray into what for Los Angeles was little known
architectural territory. Levin's designs never succumbed to pastiche,
sentimentality or historical theming: its architectural quality resided
in a taut interpretation based in historical accuracy and skilled execution.
The gamble paid off for Ratkovich, who went on with Levin to restore the
Fine Arts Building, another landmark structure on the fringe of Downtown's
prosperity. With its Romanesque lobby and facade, the style of the building
was different, but Levin's skills were applicable to other historic contexts--and
she was willing to face inflexible City Hall bureaucrats, who did not
yet understand that historic properties represented a condition different
from building new. In 1988, Ratkovich and Levin went on to their largest
and most significant challenge, the restoration of the magnificent Art
Deco Wiltern Building on Wilshire, located in an urban frontier near blighted
neighborhoods. Ahead of the curve again, Ratkovich and Levin helped turn
around a neighborhood by restoring one of its flagship structures. The
preservation of the magnificent theater within the Wiltern also gave Los
Angeles a high-profile performance venue large enough to draw crowds from
throughout the city: the theater itself was an advertisement for the rebirth
of this stretch of Wilshire, and for the preservation cause. The Conservancy
and the National Trust for Historic Preservation were celebrated opening
night, made memorable when an organist thundering at the keyboard arose
from the orchestra pit like Lazarus to a standing ovation. It was a moment
of civic joy for everyone in the audience--a moment that affirmed the
dynamic role that preservation was playing in the city. Ratkovich and
Levin followed up on their success in mid-Wilshire with another sensitive
project, the restoration of the serenely beautiful but seriously neglected
Chapman Market, a Spanish Colonial building done in an elaborate Churrigueresque
style.
Building by building, Levin was establishing a reputation as Los Angeles'
premier restoration architect. Each project, however, represented a very
particular case, requiring mastery of detail and execution: sometimes
Levin had to invent a lost trade by deploying craftsmen with different
skills. Historic preservation was not an idea whose time had come in Los
Angeles: it was a matter of a handful of dedicated people like Levin pursuing
an almost personal mission that happened to have civic import. Nothing
could be done by the book, because the book didn't exist, and the code
didn't help. In 1989, the restoration/reinterpretation of Grand Central
Market represented one of Levin's greatest restoration challenges. The
ecosystem of this bargain-basement market was fragile, and could not support
gentrification: she had to preserve an ethos and the cost infrastructure
while upgrading the cavernous plant. There was no "style" to
speak of, but a saw-dust ambiance of a working market characterized by
neon signs. Levin worked on the project with preservationist developer
Ira Yellin, and in 1991, crossed the street with him to take on Los Angeles'
crown jewel, the Bradbury Building, one of the city's most auratic structures.
This turn-of-the-century legend is highly refined, with delicate detailing,
and its environmental quality is really atmospheric: light descending
from the skylights turns amber in an atrium lined with warm brick. Restoring
the Bradbury was especially sensitive because, like a piece of literature,
the interior could not suffer a lapse in tone.
Since these signal projects, Levin has gone on to a much broader career,
building new structures from the ground up. But Angelenos will always
be grateful to the young architect who came to maturity as a practitioner
specializing in the restoration of the city's great landmarks. Each project
was more than a stand-alone building frozen in time. Along with the historic
architecture itself, Levin was bringing back a piece of the city, and
a piece of Los Angeles' consciousness.
Education | Arts
& Culture | Civic & Social
| Urban Revitalization
About Levin & Associates
| Home
|